Showing posts with label people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label people. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Recovering Your Organisation

“5 steps to getting your Organisation back on its feet”




  • Maintain Business Vision:
    ... don't lose sight of your (strategic & tactical) vision

  • Motivate People:
    ... motivating your people to want to change is not an option. Change starts with you, take a long hard look in the mirror; if you can do it so can they...

  • Cut through Bureaucracy:
    ... Communicate with Enthusiam, Energise your Thinking, Listen with both ears and eyes, Execute and Take Action

  • Changing Mindsets:
    ... Re-shaping the old way with new culture

  • Manage with Less:
    ... Adopting a lean(er) culture and structure, the timing is everything, act fast to deliver 100% efficiency to your customers inside and outside your organisation

Read More......

Friday, May 02, 2008

I will Listen and Lead

“A New Way Forward”



Gordon Brown says in his assessment about the results in the Local Elections that its his job to Listen and Lead following Labour sustaining its worst losses in 40 years to the Conservatives, leaving Labour beaten to 3rd place. So what has Mr Brown being doing as a Leader that stopped him from listening and leading effectively prior to the elections?

Taking on a leadership role requires you to be
accountable in gaining the best results, set the agenda for their team to follow and take action. Effective leaders say what they mean and do what the say they can.

Read More......

Thursday, January 24, 2008

SocGen’s €5bn rogue trader crisis

News ....

“Trust is a two way street”


Rogue trader Jérome Kerviel, a 31-year-old Frenchman, joined SocGen in 2000 and worked on the Delta One trading desk on the bank’s Paris trading floor. The bank said that because of the actions of Mr Kerviel and a €2.05bn writedown linked to subprime loans and bond insurers in the US it would launch an emergency €5.5bn rights issue. The massive trading losses were caused by positions taken in the European stock futures markets that backfired. This kind of activity raises serious questions about banks’ risk-management procedures and their ability to control their own trading positions. One analyst said: "This news will cast a dark cloud over the already troubled European banking sector." SocGen refused to give any details of the trader, who it said had confessed and been suspended pending a dismissal procedure !!!

Carlos Garcia at Fortis in Madrid:
"The most serious thing is that this puts into doubt the risk management systems at some banks. You can't suddenly announce from one day to the next a hit of $7 billion. In the light of this, what we've done is to downgrade banks that are very linked to trading income or whose capital base is weak."


SocGen boss said the rogue trader’s loss had been exaggerated by difficult market conditions this week. But he defended the bank’s risk-management processes. “All our models of stress-testing work perfectly well,”

My question is how can someone within a trading environment by-pass IT security let alone continue to operate fraudalently for a considerable amount of time, and not be noticed, whatever happened to random audit checks and monitoring ! ...

The losses raised eyebrows among other regulators around the world and provoked intense debate in Davos ...

John Gapper commented in the Telegraphy "Jérome Kerviel of Société Générale likeness to Barings is striking"

The comparisons between the trading losses at Société Générale and those which caused the collapse of Barings in 1995 are striking. In both cases, a young man responsible for trading exchange-traded equity futures on behalf of the bank ended up accumulating a big hidden position that the bank did not know about. In the Barings case, the trader was Nick Leeson, who was a trader on the floor of the Simex derivatives exchange in Singapore.

In both cases as well, the trader involved had formerly worked in the back office and was then given a promotion to a trading position. Mr Leeson earned his promotion because he was highly-regarded for his ability to solve clearing and settlement problems that had plagued Barings’ back office.

Jérome Kerviel was one of a few back office people who were promoted to the trading floor as part of the bank’s efforts to offer opportunities to people who worked in the less prestigious back office. He was allowed to trade only under strict limits and he only earned about €100,000 in compensation.

Both traders used their knowledge of back office procedures to conceal the true size of their positions from controllers at their banks
. Mr Leeson was in charge of the back office as well as trading in Singapore, while Mr Kerviel logged into computers in the names of other employees to falsify the accounts.

Another similarity is that both deceptions went on for a long time before finally being caught. Mr Leeson’s rogue trading position – in an account numbered 88888 – had been in existence for two years by the time that it escalated into the £860m loss that caused Barings’ collapse in February 1995.

The losses also escalated sharply right at the end of the deception. More than half of Mr Leeson’s losses piled up in January 1995 as the Nikkei index fell. Mr Kerviel built up a large hidden position earlier this month and the bank’s losses rose sharply this week as it struggled to close out that position.

Finally, Mr Leeson and Mr Kerviel appear to have been similar in not making a personal profit from their deceptions, beyond an impact on their annual bonuses from appearing to be successful traders.

Source: FT, Telegraph

Read More......

Friday, January 11, 2008

Failure is not the end of the road

“Rachel Elnaugh started up her company, Red Letter Days, when she was 24 and ran it successfully for 16 years. Two years ago, however, the business went bust”


AUGUST 1, 2005, was not a good day for Rachel Elnaugh. After two-and-a-half years of fighting to save the firm she had founded at 24, it went into administration, taking with it her dream of floating the business and making a fortune.

It was a spectacularly high-profile crash. Having been one of the Dragons on television’s Dragons’ Den, dispensing tough advice to would-be entrepreneurs, she found herself in the media spotlight, just days after she had given birth to her fourth child. “Looking back I don’t know how I managed to cope,” she said.

The experience of failing so publicly has had a profound effect on her. It also taught her several lessons. The first was that she should have acted sooner when she realised that Red Letter Days, which provides adventure and activity gifts, was in trouble.

“I didn’t take the problem seriously enough early on. I left it too late to get really good specialist advice. When you are an entrepreneur, you are a natural optimist. You always think some white knight is going to come out of the blue and save you.”

Her advice to others who find themselves in the same situation is simple. “Get really good people in early on. I am not talking about getting in a local accountant who happens to know a bit about corporate turnround, I am talking about getting some really shit-hot lawyers who know every trick in the book.”

Another big mistake, she said, was to limit herself to one rescue possibility. She knows now that if you are trying to keep a company afloat you must keep several options open – something she did not do.

“I closed down my options in terms of refinancing. I decided we only had time to focus on one deal but, of course, if that one deal falls through it is really difficult to get another deal off the ground because you have no time left. If I had kept three balls in the air there would have been three people vying against each other and if one deal had fallen through I would still have had two others. That was a big mistake.”

She was also wrong, she said, to be so trusting that other people had her best interests at heart. “One thing I have learnt is that you can absolutely trust no one, because everyone stands to gain from your downfall. If you are a small start-up business and you go under, nobody is interested because there is no value there. But when you are running a multi-million pound business, as Red Letter Days was, there is a lot of value for people to pick up from the ashes.

“Whether people are advisers or whether they are offering to help and do a deal, there is so much temptation for them to deceive you because there is lots of money at stake.”

She was particularly scarred by the large number of former employees who rushed to sell their stories to the press. “When I read an article in the Daily Mail called Red Letter Monster, I made a decision that I was never going to employ anyone again,” she said. “When you are running a successful company everyone wants to be your friend. A lot of people who I thought were my friends actually weren’t and that was quite tough.”

Elnaugh is aware of the importance of not dwelling on what happened. “After the initial melt-down you start to feel bitter about everyone who has betrayed you. But it is important to find a way of letting that go because otherwise you could just become a bitter old cow talking about the past. It is really important to forgive and forget.”

For someone with such a high media profile, Elnaugh found it particularly hard listening to what others were writing and saying about her without being able to put her side of the story. So six months ago she started a blog on her website, Rachelelnaugh.com , to respond to comments written about her.

“It is very empowering. I wish I had done it at the time. I didn’t have a voice. Now I am on every network and have Google Alert so I know everything that is said about me and I can instantly correct it.”

After her fight to save Red Letter Days, when the end actually came, to her surprise her main feeling was one of relief. “When I finally said enough, I am just going to let go, I thought it would be awful but actually it was a liberation. It was like the chains were off and I was free.”

Red Letter Days was subsequently bought out of administration by fellow Dragons, Peter Jones and Theo Paphitis.

Initially, Elnaugh thought she wanted to be back in a business and so took a job as the chief executive of an online company called Easy Art. But after just three months she realised she had made a big mistake and resigned. “I just realised that it was not what I wanted to do. Going to work in a structured company for someone else was absolutely the wrong thing.”

Instead she started accepting invitations to speak at business events about her experiences and to mentor other fledgling entrepreneurs and small businesses. “It was quite cathartic to tell the story of the rise and the fall and how that felt and how I coped with it,” she said. “I got many e-mails of support from people who heard me speak and that was something really positive for me to hold on to.”

Six months after the business crashed, Elnaugh also physically left her old London-focused life behind by moving with her family to Bakewell in the Peak District. It was a decision she can wholeheartedly recommend to anyone in the same situation.

“It was the best decision I ever made in my life. It was just so liberating. When you are in that situation, reinventing your life is a good strategy.”

She has now also written a book, Business Nightmares – lessons entrepreneurs learnt the hard way, to be published in March, about how other high-profile businessmen and women have dealt with failure.

She said: “What I am doing feels far more valuable than what I was doing before. I have changed, but I am still as ambitious. I would like my obituary to say that I was one of the most important influences in entrepreneurship in the 21st century.”

The experience of losing her company has clearly had a profound effect on her life – not least by realising that winning at business is not everything. “When you are in business it is very easy to chase the golden pot at the end of the rainbow,” said Elnaugh. “I had done that for years, thinking one day I am going to float this company on the stock market and be fantastically wealthy.

“But you spend a whole lifetime chasing that golden dollar and in the meantime you are not living your life. So although I lost the company I got my life back.”

She finds it hard that she is unlikely to shake off the failure tag very soon. “Suddenly you have this label that you are a failure and everyone forgets about the previous 16 years.”

But two years on from losing Red Letter Days, Elnaugh, 43, is sanguine about her experiences. “I think everything happens for a reason and even if at the time things look very black and awful, something positive will come out of that experience. You just need to have a bit of trust and faith that it is part of a bigger plan – you just can’t see the whole picture at that time.”

Source: Times

Read More......

Friday, December 07, 2007

Can you get by on 4 hours of sleep

“Some research suggests that while seven to eight hours a night is healthy, under five hours or more than eight is unhealthy, and linked to disorders such as heart disease, depression, diabetes and high blood pressure.”



For 264 hours, Randy Gardner did not go to sleep. He felt tired, but each time the urge to rest his head on a pillow came upon him, he played basketball and, after 11 days and nights in January 1964, he broke the world record for sleeplessness. He thanked his supporters, held a press conference and promptly passed out.

The only time it can rest is during sleep The dominant theory is that sleep is a time for the brain to store memory. The idea is that during sleep the brain, in effect, goes offline to file the events of the day. Another theory is that the brain is a complex organ that needs the downtime provided by sleep to recover from the stresses of waking hours. “While we are awake, the higher centres of the brain are working flat out,” The question is what would happen if you were to change your sleep pattern from 7-8 hours to 4?

If you sleep for:

4 HOURS Your immune system becomes compromised. Researchers at the University of Chicago exposed sleep-deprived students – four hours a night for six nights – to flu vaccine, their immune systems produced only half the normal number of antibodies. Stress levels rose, raising heart rates and blood pressure.

5 HOURS Your risk of diabetes increases. Research at Boston University School of Medicine suggests that those who have less than five hours a night were 2.5 times more likely to develop diabetes compared with those having seven to eight. You also increase the risk of being overweight. According to research at Bristol University, the rise in obesity may be partly because of the reduced amount of time we spend asleep. People who sleep for five hours were found to have 15 per cent more ghrelin, a hormone that increases feelings of hunger, than those who slept for eight hours. They were also found to have 15 per cent less leptin, a hormone that suppresses appetite.

6 HOURS Watch out for high blood pressure. A study reported in Hypertension suggests that those who sleep less than six hours a night had more than double the risk of high blood pressure.

And if you've been awake for:

10 HOURS Levels of the stress hormone cortisol begin to rise. There may also be changes in blood pressure.

12 HOURS The likelihood of having a car accident more than doubles. Heart rate begins to slow.

17-28 HOURS Speed in mental tasks slows to the equivalent of someone who has drunk the drink-drive legal limit of alcohol.

24 HOURS Risk-taking behaviour increases. Verbal fluency declines.

48 HOURS Effectiveness of immune system declines.

53 HOURS Ability to make moral judgments declines.

72 HOURS Speed and accuracy in computer tests drop to 30 per cent of normal.

85 HOURS Brain activity declines significantly.

11 DAYS Longest documented period of voluntary sleeplessness is 264 hours. No long-term harmful effects found.

Sources: US Federal Highways Commission; University of New South Wales; University of California, San Diego; North Carolina University; Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Johns Hopkins University

Some famous people who claimed they can function on 4 hours or less:

1. Jay Leno – four hours
"He subsists on four hours' sleep per night. Out of fifty-two weeks, he gets
four weeks off, during which time he is miserable. "I hate those weeks off," he
tells me. "To me, a week's vacation just means you're now a week behind."
http://www.bergsoe.dtu.dk/~pbk2512/article1.htm

2. Madonna – four hours
"Madonna has revealed she only grabs four hours' sleep a night because she
constantly worries about everything that is going on her life."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/music/newsid_1420000/1420364.stm

3. Florence Nightingale – four hours
"Florence Nightingale only slept four hours a night"
http://www.soyouwanna.com/site/syws/insomnia/insomnia.html

4. Anton Ballard – four hours
"Ballard keeps pushing himself to get better. He averages around four hours of
sleep per night, and works about 12 hours each day between his meat counter and
his studio."
http://www.deep-end.com/bfacts.htm

5. Michelangelo – four hours
"Both aboriginal peoples and highly creative people (such as Thomas Edison and
Michelangelo) rarely sleep for more than four hours at a time."
http://www.susunweed.com/Article_Anthrax_Interview.htm

6. Napoleon Bonaparte – four hours
"Napoleon Bonaparte learned to live with the fact that he was only existing on
three or four hours sleep a night and got on with his grand schemes."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A294031

7. Bill Clinton – five to six hours
"President Clinton grabs 5-6 hours"
http://www.powersleep.org/sleepmatters.htm

8. Winston Churchill – six hours
"It was claimed he only spent 6 hours in bed every night. However, he wrote
that one needs to take a complete nap every afternoon, to get fully undressed
and really go to bed. No "halfway measures". He claimed the reward was to "get
two days in one - well, at least one and a half, I'm sure." He claimed this nap
was absolutely neccessary to cope with his responsibilities during the war. His
naps were 1.5 to 2 hours long, for a total of about 8 hours a day!"
http://www.mysleepcenter.com/FamousSleepers.html

9. Nikola Tesla – two hours
"He is said, by some of his followers, to only have slept 2 hours a day. He was
definitely a night owl. But his staff has told of him taking many naps during
the day. And it seems he may have been narcoleptic, and able to sleep with his
eyes open."
http://www.mysleepcenter.com/FamousSleepers.html

10. Leonardo Da Vinci – 15 mins every four hours (ie. 1.5 hours)
" It was said that he would sleep just 15 minutes of every four hours."
http://www.mysleepcenter.com/FamousSleepers.html

11. Margaret Thatcher – four hours
"Margaret Thatcher, the former prime minister, was famous for getting by on
only four hours a night."
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/archive/15-2-19102-0-37-6.html

12. Martha Stewart – four hours
"“There’s not enough time in the day,” complains the woman who says she needs
no more than four hours’ sleep a night."
http://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/marthastewart/

13. Thomas Edison – four hours
"Thomas Edison slept 3-4 hours at night, regarding sleep as a waste of time"
http://www.powersleep.org/sleepmatters.htm

Read More......

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Quality over Quantity

Former Citigroup chief Chuck Prince commented last week that the firm needed to

“install better leaders within top management rather than break up the various businesses”



Restructuring is an unsettling time for both the management team and its people. It often the case a new person steps into the shoes of his/her predecessor, the reporting lines and the business landscapes shifts from decentralised to centralised and vice-versa.
Todd Thomson ex Citigroup noted at the NY Reuters Finance Summit that “I fundamentally don’t believe the issues at Citi are ones of strategy. I fundamentally don’t believe the issues at Citi are ones of being in too many products and too many businesses. I fundamentally believe it’s an issue of execution.” He futher added: “If you look at every other significant bank out there today, they do exactly the same thing Citi does. There’s nothing that Citi does that JP Morgan doesn’t do, that Bank of America doesn’t do, that UBS doesn’t do, that HSBC doesn’t do. They all do the same things.”

Its true, its not how many product lines you have. It comes back to leadership and execution, having the right person at the top of the company who can look down and see what's happening on the ground level, listens to people, has a management team that works as a team.

Source: Financial News Online

Read More......

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

One in four plan work break

Independent Television News reports today that

“One in four people are planning to take a break from work in the next year, often to do charity work or achieve a lifetime goal”


A poll of 1,200 adults by Norwich Union suggests that almost one in five of those aiming to have a career break will not return to their job, creating a huge replacement bill for UK businesses. The trend looks set to send stress levels soaring in workplaces across the UK, with seven in ten of those polled admitting that simply covering colleagues' two-week holidays will leave them struggling to cope this summer, said the report.
Travel or spending more time with family remain popular reasons for career breaks, but over three quarters said more colleagues were taking time out to do charity or volunteer work.

Judith Brodie, director of international development charity VSO UK, said: 'At VSO we've seen a real change in attitude to sabbaticals over the years, and this is not something that's going to go away.

'As we move further away from the traditional idea of the linear career path there seems to be a growing acceptance that allowing your staff time to develop their skills and widen their experiences outside of the workplace is good for business.'

Read More......

Monday, January 22, 2007

Red and Green Foods are good for Men

Eating tomatoes and broccoli in the same meal could help men to fight prostate cancer.
A study suggests that when they are both present in a regular diet, the two foods — known for their cancer-fighting qualities — help to reduce tumours more effectively than when they are eaten separately.

Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in Britain, accounting for almost one in four cancers in men. Each year about 32,000 cases are diagnosed and more than 10,000 men die from it. Researchers from the University of Illinois believe that different compounds in the vegetables can work together to attack cancer cells along different biological pathways.

Read the full story

Read More......

Friday, January 19, 2007

Law of Attraction - How To

You attract into your life whatever you think about. That's true. Your dominant thoughts will find a way to manifest. There are no coincidences. You will attract everything in your life and continue to do so, unless you change you're thinking. Every time you use the word Coincidence, Serendipity, Synchronicity, Fate, Karma is the Law of Attraction, a science, we need to learn to respond to the mood, vibes (vibration) we give off. In practical terms an example ... "Oh I should of stayed in bed syndrome" ever had a day when the morning starts off with bad vibes and then everything that happens during that day is falling apart and horrible. Our feelings are a result of the thought we are thinking. The three BAD words that cause you to send negative vibration are:

  • Don't
  • Not
  • No

Why do we need to eliminate don't not and no, well because when you think of these words you automatically bring attention to negative energy by giving it attention. Remember the saying 'Like Attracts Like'. If you continue to do things in the same old way, you get the same results. Likewise if you keep choosing the wrong kind of relationships, make the same mistakes with money you create a pattern that becomes comfortable. Make this the year that you turn things around. Start thinking positive from this very minute.

So now you wondering
How do I Attract More of what I want
and Less of what I Don’t
.
Well, when you shift you' thoughts and go from what you do want, the vibration changes sending a positive vibration. Law of Attraction responds to the vibration you send out. Remind yourself, about the things you don't want to show up in your life. What you want to do is build on the good vibrations. Say to yourself I will, I can apply this positive thinking principle to everything I do today and tomorrow and every situation from now onwards, by resetting your vibrations to positive ones. What you are doing is duplicating the good vibration you were just sending.

Let's set the energy in motion, by resetting the vibration, change the words and ask yourself:
  • So what do you (I) want
  • What do you (I) want to change
  • What can you (I) reset

Read More......

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Controversial ... C4 Big Brother

BBC News Headlines ... A row over remarks made to Celebrity Big Brother's Shilpa Shetty will be raised in Parliament after thousands of viewers complained to the TV watchdog. Housemates Jade Goody, Danielle Lloyd and Jo O'Meara have been seen making fun of the Bollywood star's accent. On Monday night's episode, O'Meara reportedly suggested that Indians were thin because they were always ill as a result of undercooking their food. C4 reported girly rivalry ... now the game show has forced a 'early day motion' to debate on the particular subject matter - maybe it will not put an end to the ( Jealousy, Bullying & Racism ) watched by million of Big Brother viewers but the publicity it brings with the so called girly rivalry may lower Ms Goody, Lloyd and O'Meara's celeb status. All three of these women are playing out their inhibitions, this type of behaviour is shocking in any situation, least said it might well be there last major acting role for a while.



... David Cameron on BBC News 24

Read More......